The Asian Le Mans Series' LMP3 title battle took an unexpected turn when Inter Europol Competition's winning crew was disqualified from the 4 Hours of Abu Dhabi. Alexander Bukhantsov and Chun Ting Chou were leading the standings by a five-point margin, but their victory was overturned due to a technical infraction. The issue stemmed from the Inter Europol Ligier's missing front damper cover, which exposed mechanical components, violating the LMP3 Prototype Technical Regulations. This led to CLX Motorsport's No. 17 Ligier, driven by Paul Lanchere, Kevin Rabin, and Alexander Jacoby, being declared the winners and earning maximum points. The 23Events Racing Ligier, previously in second place, was promoted to second place. Despite the disqualification, the championship remains mathematically alive for Bukhantsov and Chou, as they are now 19 points behind CLX. The series concludes on Sunday with Race 2, where the outcome will determine the LMP3 champion. But here's where it gets controversial... The stewards' decision to disqualify Inter Europol has sparked debate among fans and experts alike. Some argue that the team should have been given the benefit of the doubt, while others believe the infraction was clear and the correct decision was made. This is the part most people miss... The technical regulations are complex and often misunderstood. The LMP3 Prototype Technical Regulations, in particular, are a dense document that requires a deep understanding of racing mechanics. This leaves room for interpretation and potential disagreements, especially when it comes to technical infractions. So, what do you think? Do you agree with the stewards' decision to disqualify Inter Europol? Or do you think they should have been given the benefit of the doubt? Share your thoughts in the comments below and let's discuss!
